One year after Dobbs, right-wing media are attacking surrogacy as a “morally horrific practice”
Published
One year after Roe v. Wade was overturned, and as right-wing media have scrambled to find a unified position on reproductive rights to force through the legal system, some are testing out surrogate pregnancy as a possible target.
Right-wing media personalities, particularly those from The Daily Wire, have recently denounced surrogacy as “evil,” often relying on the homophobic and sexist belief that men cannot care for children as women can, and that surrogacy means depriving children of their biological mother.
Surrogacy exists as an option for people who are unable to have biological children, including those who struggle with infertility, whose lives could be seriously endangered by a pregnancy, and LGBTQ couples unable to have biological children together. While attacks on surrogacy are not new — it has been debated in the United States for decades, often regarding the health and rights of surrogate mothers — conservatives have seemingly entered the debate now in order to fuel a certain post-Roe, decidedly anti-LGBTQ mission to allegedly protect the nuclear family.
This pushback ties into a larger trend of right-wing media attacking non-heteronormative and/or egalitarian relationships and pushing furiously for their vision of a moral society, which does not include surrogacy, hormonal birth control, IVF, no-fault divorce, single motherhood, working women, or women who choose to not have children.
This came into painful view at Turning Point USA’s Young Women’s Leadership Summit in early June, where young, prominent right-wing media personalities including Candace Owens, Alex Clark, Charlie Kirk, and Benny Johnson preached to high school and college-aged women that they needed to put their career aspirations on hold, that hormonal contraceptives are dangerous and unnatural, that daycare is harmful for children, and that being a wife and mother should be the ultimate goal in their lives.
There is no space left for parenthood achieved outside this framework; anything else is deemed immoral and dangerous. As surrogacy is a pathway for those who do not fit neatly into the model, it must be wrong.