Research/Study
Fox News anchors Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum failed to fact-check first GOP debate
Published
The first 2024 Republican presidential primary debate, which was hosted Wednesday night by Fox News, was hyped as not only being a chance for the candidates to make an impression, but also as an opportunity for Fox anchors Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum to present a serious face for the network. But during the debate itself, the two moderators repeatedly let the candidates get away with numerous false statements.
- Republican pollster Frank Luntz predicted the two “are people of substance who will run a very tight ship without being abusive and without being nasty.” Luntz also singled out Baier as “the most important talent at Fox, because he puts the news into Fox News.” [The Washington Post, 8/22/23]
- Baier and MacCallum have themselves been longtime vectors for misinformation from Fox. The two have each spread misinformation about the results of the 2020 election, and Baier downplayed the January 6 insurrection both during and after Trump supporters attacked the Capitol. [Media Matters, 8/21/23]
- Baier and MacCallum argued that Fox should have let right-wing viewers’ feelings override “statistics and the numbers” in calling the election result. Baier also urged the network to retract its projection that Joe Biden had won the swing state of Arizona, despite the fact that Trump was never ahead in the vote count there. [Media Matters, 3/5/23]
With that track record, nobody should have expected the two Fox “news side” anchors to bring factual knowledge to the table at this debate, let alone to correct falsehoods from the Republican candidates that would have matched up with their audience’s desires and Fox’s own running narratives. While various mainstream news outlets fact-checked statements from the candidates, Baier and MacCallum did not attempt any such thing — and Baier even introduced a false claim into the discussion himself.